Saturday, January 26, 2013

Living a 'Second Life'


I have a confession and I’m actually a little ashamed of it.  In my final year of high school I was addicted to… Farmville…

Well there you have it, out in the open for everyone to see.

Games such as Farmville, Second Life and The Sims use simulacra which according to Plato is a term used to describe a false copy of something (Mann).  These games provide a copy of society in an online environment where people are substituted with avatars.  thefreedictionary.com describes an avatar as a moveable character the user controls (Farlex Inc. 2013)

In Farmville I created an avatar in my likeness and through my avatar I built my farm from the ground up, building fences, acquiring animals and planting and harvesting crops.  The crops themselves depending on the plant would take from a half-hour to three days to grow.

Theorist Baudrillard argues that ‘in a world dominated by media and the internet the idea of a ‘true’ or ‘false’ copy has been destroyed and all we have left now are simulations of reality which aren’t any more or less ‘real’ than the reality they simulate’ (Mann). 

Though I was quite addicted to the game I didn’t feel the need to push my obsession to the next level and actually pay for additional things for my avatar.  It is argued that these hyper reality games are simply replicating our consumer driven society, however I think it is a little more complex than that.  It’s not uncommon in these games for people to exchange their hard earned cash for the equivalent of the game’s currency.  Julian Dibbell (in the documentary You Only Live Twice) (2007) states that people become that invested in the game socially and psychologically that they are willing to pay for these fake things and actually perceive it as an investment (Four Corners 2007). 

You Only Live Twice explores this social and psychological investment in the game Second Life where people become quite attached to their avatars living through them and value the social relationships forged with other people’s avatars (Four Corners 2007).  The documentary’s presenter, Ticky Fullerton experiments by adopting her own avatar and soon becomes attached to the avatar taking the insults and compliments it receives quite personally (Four Corners 2007).

Businesses and chain stores are starting to move into games such as Second Life taking advantage of people’s attachment to their avatars.  People such as Veronica Brown have found Second Life to be quite lucrative for them and are able to draw a substantial income from it (Four Corners 2007). Brown became quite successful designing bridal and evening wear for people’s avatars (Four Corners 2007).  Chain stores such as American Apparel have also set up shop within Second Life where you enter the store, click on a piece of clothing and two images appear, on your left a piece of clothing to purchase for your avatar and on the right a version for you which can be purchased and delivered to your door (Four Corners 2007).     

 As great as it is for businesses to take exploit people’s attachment to avatars it’s important to examine what this is doing to our real world relationships.  On games such as Second Life, users’ avatars can meet each other forging social relationships online (Four Corners 2007).  Psychologist, Sherry Turkle (2012) explains the implications of these online relationships she states that people are afraid of intimacy and that ‘people can’t get enough of each other as long as they can have each other at a distance in amounts that they can control and an effect of this is that we sacrifice conversation’ (TED 2012).

One may argue that through games like Second Life people can converse with other users however, these conversations can be edited and retouched; Turkle emphasises that with conversations that take place in the real world you can’t control what you’re going to say, you can’t edit or retouch (TED 2012).

Taking this all into consideration will we all end up living a ‘Second Life’?  Will the way people work, play, socialise and develop relationships all move online?  In a way I think this has already occurred people often work and communicate through email, people shop online,  play virtual games with each other and socialise and develop relationships through Facebook and Twitter.  Conversely, my job (in banking) is customer centric and internet banking has not eliminated my role (for now) and I much prefer the instant gratification of shopping in a store and I communicate with family, friends and my partner through technology but I will annoy them if I haven’t seen them face-to-face in a while.  I can’t imagine living in a world where people all live a ‘second life’ to be honest I have a hard enough time navigating my first life with work, university and different relationships I haven’t even been on Facebook today.

***The author of this blog would like to disclose that she does not use Farmville anymore and this was just a phase***  
 
(iPad News Daily 2002)
 

Saturday, January 19, 2013

The Need To Know (WikiLeaks)?


In 2010, the organisation WikiLeaks released 250,000 diplomatic US cables for the world to see (Kinsman 2011, p. 45).  These cables (messages between diplomats and the government) contained information on geopolitics, smugglers, ex-military fixers and corrupt politicians and businesses (ref).  US Secretary of State Hilary Clinton believes that the leak ‘puts people’s lives in danger, threatens our national security, and undermines (US) efforts to work with other countries to solve shared problems’(Kinsman 2011, p.45).  Former Governor of Alaska, Sarah Palin likens WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange (and his team) to terrorists like Al-Qaeda (Kinsman 2011, p.45).  Though I wonder if she is still sore about WikiLeaks hacking her Yahoo (email) account (Wachter 2010).
 
(Ted Goff 2008)

It is unclear as to if the leaks have endangered any lives though she does raise a valid point there must be a limit to ‘maximum possible disclosure’ as the US (or any country in fact) needs to be able to communicate in confidence and in turn protect the information they receive in confidence (Kinsman 2011, p.46). 

The cables have proved to be quite embarrassing for the US as they have revealed confidential information about international relations, one cable describes the German foreign minister as ‘incompetent, vain and critical of the US’ (Kinsman 2011, p.46).  It reminds me of the common adage ‘if you don’t have anything nice to say don’t say it at all’.  Messages such as this are perhaps interesting to the public but they aren’t really ‘need to know’. 

However, social media does play a vital role in disseminating information and reducing corruption.  In terms of fighting corruption, social media can empower users giving them a platform on which to speak (Bertot, Jaeger and Grimes 2010, p.264).  It also allows users to collaborate and connect with each other and form what Howard Rheingold calls a virtualcommunity (Rheingold).  A virtual community involves people coming together, in an online environment based on a common interest and in this case it would be political activism (Rheingold).  Social media also allows users to participate both in the creation of media and the ability to share this media and other information.  Social media sites such as WikiLeaks fosters what media theorist, Henry Jenkins calls participatory culture (DMLReseachHub 2011).  Assange and his WikiLeaks team take it upon themselves to be whistle blowers or digital activists (I’m sure the government believes them to be hacktivists) they take media into their own hands, producing and sharing media in their efforts to make a difference; holding the government(s) accountable for their transparency (DMLResearchHub 2011).

With all of this said governments are becoming more forth-right with sharing information with the public, encouraging transparency through the implementation of information communication and technology (ICTs) tools such as e-government sites (Bertot, Jaeger and Grimes 2010, p. 265).  In their bid to reduce corruption many nations have released these e-government sites giving public information on things such as how the peoples’ hard earned tax money is being spent (Bertot, Jaeger and Grimes 2010, p.265).  As the public can monitor the government’s expenditure it eliminates spending on wasteful projects (Bertot, Jaeger and Grimes 2010, p.265).
As long as people feel that the government is keeping public ‘need to know’ information from them, sites like WikiLeaks will continue to exist.  Even after all the ‘government attention’ WikiLeaks have confirmed that Assange has not been arrested yet (WikiLeaks 2012). 

 
Though the question remains is Assange a whistle blower, activist, terrorist or hactivist?
Comment below and tell me what you think
 
References
Bertot, J, Jaeger, P and Grimes, J 2010, 'Using ICTs to create a culture of transparency: E-goverment and social media as openness and anti-corruption tools for societies', Government Information Quarterly, vol. 27, no. 3,, pp 264-271 viewed 19 January 2013 http://ac.els-cdn.com/S0740624X10000201/1-s2.0-S0740624X10000201-main.pdf?_tid=6cc2aca2-773a-11e2-9e19-00000aab0f01&acdnat=1360910539_286d64a5b0e5cf7f6a966aeea7aa6be1
Kinsman, J 2011, TRUTH AND CONSEQUENCE: THE WIKILEAKS SAGA, viewed 19 January 2013 http://www.irpp.org/po/archive/feb11/kinsman.pdf   
Wachter, P 2010, Just Who is Julian Assange, the Man Behind WikiLeaks?, Aol News viewed 19 January 2013 http://www.aolnews.com/2010/07/26/just-who-is-julian-assange-the-man-behind-wikileaks/
 


Sunday, January 13, 2013

Vote 1 for Social Media!


I recently went into a local election where I had no idea who the candidates were or what they stood for.  In the weeks coming up to the election I tried to find out.  I went through my usual channels I asked my friends, my family and then I went to Google.  I even tried watching the local news hoping that I could get some information but there was nothing… 

Come Election Day I voted for the names I liked the best and I wasn’t the only one.  My Facebook Newsfeed echoed the same concern, we the younger voters (even the more mature voters) had no idea who was to run our city and what they stood for.

Contrary to popular belief young people do care who is running their country (or their city).  In the book Millenial Makeover: How a Generation is Remaking America Mohammed (2006) said

Young people are not apathetic.  They don’t suffer from a lack of interest, but suffer from a lack of access’ (cited in Winograd, Morley Hais and Michael 2008, p. 164).

Let’s discuss a lack of access.  Young voters aren’t inaccessible when at any given time of the day they are connected to Facebook, Twitter and Instagram.  Perhaps the younger voter is not accessible in a way that Australian politicians are promoting their cause. 

The younger generation of voters are defined by sharing.  They feel the need to share whatever comes to mind at any given time enabled by social networking sites (Winograd, Morley Hais and Michael 2008, p. 167).

Most recently a YouTube video captured by the ABC (2012) of Prime Minister Gillard’s speech went viral.  She gave a speech labelling opposition leader Tony Abbott as a misogynist defending both herself and the women of Australia against alleged sexist remarks made in the past.  The West Australian (2012) reported that the video resonated so strongly with the Australian public the video was viewed more than 300,000 times on YouTube within the first day and made its way into international headlines in the U.S, Canada, India and South Africa.

According to social media expert Dean Power the sharing of the video was key to its success.  The more a video is shared, the more likely it makes it onto most watched lists and through the velocity of sharing it gets even more attention as it becomes famous on the internet.

Politicians may be feeling the pressure that they need to provide entertainment as well as credibility.  As Ms Gillard has just proved the public responded when she stood up for what she believed in.  She delivered a speech that was both passionate and eloquent.  There wasn’t anything humorous about the speech, she was authentic and it’s this authenticity that the Australian public responded to. 

In the book Campaigning for President (2008) Garrett M. Graff, author of the ‘The First Campaign’ observed the working of American presidential candidate Howard Dean’s campaign in 2004 he noted that
‘Dean didn’t master the technology, but he understood the energy  that was going on online’(cited in Johnson D 2008, p. 153). 
It’s this energy and passion that grips people emotionally and makes people want to support a candidate and if social media is used the candidate’s message will reach more people.   
Graff made the important point that
‘Now as the media and media choices change, so politics must change’ (cited in Johnson D 2008, p. 153).

In 2007 the Australian Labour Party tried something unheard of in Australian politics they launched the social media campaign Kevin ’07.  The campaign involved YouTube videos, text messages, blogs and the infamous Kevin’07 t-shirts.  Though not nearly as sophisticated as American social media campaigns this was a new way of attracting the public particularly the younger vote. 

During Barack Obama’s election campaign the website MyBarackObama was set up where the user can register to vote and contact others within the site sharing their opinions and organising events persuading the undecided to join Obama’s campaign.  This is what theorist, Howard Rheingold describes as a virtual community as people are uniting online and coming together based on the common interest of their political party (Rheingold).

The communities are a part of what theorist Henry Jenkins calls a participatory culture (DMLResearchHub 2011).  They are participating in a cause that they believe in producing and sharing media creating these events and showing support through email, Facebook, Myspace, YouTube and creating entities such as ObamaGirl trying to persuade the undecided or the ‘non-believers’ to convert.

This year the Prime Minister must set a date for the federal election and judging from Julia Gillard’s and Tony Abbott’s Facebook pages (152, 201 fans & 27,946 fans) social media doesn’t appear to be their angle.  To capture the votes of the younger voter and the time poor it is imperative that they move some of their campaigning online and perhaps employ the participatory culture tactic as Obama did, letting his supporters boost his profile.  However, Australia has a long way to go before politicians start using the sorts of social media campaigning that American’s have adopted.  As they say Australia is 10 years behind America (maybe in this case 20).  Thanks for having a try Kevin!

image - Social Politics
(Hawkins 2012)
 

Saturday, December 15, 2012

Save the Frogs!



Picture this, a large garden shed in the backyard, the ground was damp, it had been raining and it was about to start again.  Two young girls snuck out from under their mother’s watchful eye, behind the shed where they knew the fence was lined with baby ‘frogs’.  The girls were on a mission! The frogs must be saved! They can’t be left out in the rain to catch cold! No! So handful by handful they were relocated to indoor pot plants, the mail box, their father’s work boots…

Needless to say the young girls were my sister and I and the ‘frogs’ were really toads.  Dad placed his foot into his work boots only to be met with the squelchy bodies of baby toads and we were in immense trouble.  Let’s just say it didn’t do much for his fear of frogs.      


(Ridge Haven 2010)
 


 

 

 


 
 

 
 
That had been one of my first forms of eco-activism, followed by a recycling crusade, water saving campaign (thanks Sesame Street) and a need to save trees at my local primary school.  I am thankful that back then I didn’t have access to the means of communication that now enables digital activism.  Digital activism uses digital technology as a platform (think blogs and social media websites) to increase the effectiveness of a social or political change campaign (Sivitanides & Shah 2011).  Many years later I’m not the Green Peace activist that I originally envisioned in fact I lead a remarkably uncontroversial life. 

Looking at my broader engagement of digital activism a few years ago I joined the Facebook group ‘1,000,000 people in search for Daniel Morcombe’.  In December 2003, Daniel Morcombe was abducted from a bus shelter near the Sunshine Coast.  I joined that group to raise awareness, hoping that more and more people would join through exposure to my Facebook profile and that Daniel would eventually be found.  His family used both traditional media outlets (television, radio and print) as well as digital media (websites and social networks) as a platform to reach people encouraging people to put forth information whilst also highlighting the issue of children safety.

Digital activism can occur in different forms other than social media.  Culture jammers may feel they need to highlight particular issues often using detournment.  Culture jammers resist cultural hegemony by means of guerrilla communication strategies where they’ll reuse a well-known text creating a new text that carries a message contrary to the message the producer intended (Bainbridge, Goc & Tynan 2011, p.192).  An example of this is the use of the Harry Potter series texts through fan-fictions sites where fans can create stories based on the original Harry Potter novels where they explore the relationships between characters, create new adventures, etc.   I’ve read fans’ stories where they explore the homosexual relationship between the character Dumbledore and Grindelwald. 

Cultural critic, Mark Dery (2010) views cultural jammers as ‘part artistic terrorists, part vernacular critics’.   Dery describes what culture jammers do to texts as ‘media sabotage’.

One would think that well-known books such as Harry Potter would be covered by stringent copyright laws.  However, these culture jammers are able to use Rowling’s story altering her intended message.  Dery (2010) states ‘jammers offer irrefutable evidence that the right has no copyright of war waged with incantations and simulations’.  Media sabotage indeed.

I honestly don’t think that the authors of these fan-fictions mean to detract from Rowling’s original story but more so that by writing these altered versions of Harry Potter they are representing issues they’re passionate about; their own form of digital activism. 

However, there are some culture jammers that participate in ‘Anti-branding’ a type of consumer activism that’s seen as a counter attack against capitalism, there has been a growing resistance towards certain brands and globalisation (Sivitanides & Shah 2011, p.5).  Such as Greenpeace pressuring Levi jeans through social network campaigns using Levi’s logos on signs and altering Levi’s advertisements to create a new message.

I think social media will continue to be a strong contributor to activism in the future.  Social media is a free and is an easy way of reaching the masses and is becoming more and more accessible with the growing number of mobile devices that can access social media at any time of the day or night.  Essentially it’s like we’re carrying these activists’ messages in our pockets.


References

Bainbridge, J, Goc, N & Tynan, L 2011, Media and Journalism. 2. Oxford University Press Australia Higher Education, VitalSource Bookshelf, viewed 15 December 2012.
Dery, M 2010, Culture Jamming: Hacking, Slashing, and Sniping in the Empire of Signs, Shovelware, October 8, viewed 15 December 2012 http://markdery.com/?page_id=154

Sivitanides, M & Shah, V 2011, The Era of Digital Activism, CONISAR Proceedings, viewed 15 December 2012 http://proc.conisar.org/2011/pdf/1842.pdf

Bracale, R 2008, (c)20090614 [image], Ridge Haven, viewed 16 December 2012 http://www.ourridgehaven.com/A_Menu_Photos_RH03.htm
 
Colvin, M 2012, Morcombe laid to rest 9 years on, ABC News, viewed 16 December 2012 http://www.abc.net.au/news/2012-12-07/morecombe-laid-to-rest-9-years-on/4415806

Mugglenet 1999, viewed 16 December 2012 http://www.mugglenet.com/
 

 

Saturday, December 8, 2012

Twitter: What is it good for! Absolutely Nothing?


Twitter is :

 A short burst of inconsequential information.
OR
Chirps from birds.

(Cross 2011, p. 58)

This is exactly what Twitter is, short status updates made up of 140 characters or less.  Twitter has evolved using other technologies such as the first mobile phones that could use up to 160 characters in a text and other social networks such as Facebook and Myspace.
 
Though is it all inconsequential information?

 Well most of it is, such as the aesthetically pleasing photos of your breakfast.  However, Twitter is also being used for political, social and cultural reasons.   An example of political usage is during President Obama’s election campaign he used Twitter as a platform to connect with potential voters.  It gave him a distinct advantage and was a first for politics.
Past reports have also linked people to using Twitter in a crisis.  In November 2008, 10 terrorists took over 2 hotels in Mumbai.  The television feeds were shut down as the terrorist were using it for their own purposes and so the victims in the hotel tweeted for help.  They were able to provide up-to-the-minute updates on the situation as it unfolded (Cross 2011, p. 58).  Twitter has also been used in other times of crisis; the earthquakes in both Haiti and Japan and the Victorian bushfires. 

The situation with Japan is actually quite close to my heart my host sister, Nami lived in one of the affected areas. Through social networking she let us know that she was OK.
 
When using Twitter you’re not constrained to a computer, it’s portable as long as you have a smart phone device hence why Nami could tell me she was OK.  On a global scale Twitter is available in 6 languages; English, French, Japanese, German, Italian and Spanish and is available in 26 countries for mobile device users.  This can lead to the exclusion of some audiences such as people that don’t own mobile devices (older generations).
Some countries would rather social media sites did not exist.  The Iranian government attempted to cut off sites such as Facebook and Twitter to stop the flow of information in and out of the country to stop activists from communicating in regards to their protests.  Henry Jenkins, media scholar and theorist says that we’re living in a world of participatory culture ‘where we take media into our own hands, where we have the capacity to produce media, to share media’ (DMLResearchHub 2011).

So whilst we’re practicing using media i.e. posting photos of our breakfast, some of us go onto tackling major issues such as sharing protest information. And so where there is a will there is a way… Activists used proxy servers to get past this and used sites such as Twitter to communicate in real time to ex-patriots in America and other Western Nations (Acohido 2009). 
However, Twitter is primarily used socially and you can connect with friends at any time of the day.  As opposed to a text message Twitter’s major drawcard is that it is free.  I can’t say that I’m a regular user of Twitter but one of the main reasons I have a Twitter account is that I can ‘follow’ celebrities. 

One of my favourite celebrities is Xfactor judge, Demi Lovato.  Lovato has built a strong following of fans which she has affectionately dubbed ‘Lovatics’.  Demi tweets well throughout the day but she also ‘retweets’.  Just recently the Xfactor judge asked her ‘Lovatics’ to vote the contestant she was mentoring and ‘retweeted’ her followers messages, acknowledging them and making them feel special.      

So what next for Twitter? 

Will it be around forever? Or will it drop off the face of the Earth? Like Myspace did. 

There isn’t anything conclusive to say what the future has in store for Twitter and the organisation of Twitter certainly holds its cards close to their chest.  Though with the increase of people aligning together, in what theorist, Howard Rheingold calls virtual communities (people linked by their participation in computer networks) (ScottLondon, n.d.).   Twitter seems to be growing faster than ever.  So we’ll see.

Reference List

Cross, M 2007, Bloggerati, Twitterarti: How Blogs and Twitter are Transforming Popular Culture, Greenwood Publishing /group, EBL Ebook Library, viewed 7 December 2012.

Acohido, B, 2009, Iranian activists use Twitter, proxy servers to deliver news from the streets, The Last Watchdog, viewed 7 December 2012, http://lastwatchdog.com/iranian-activists-twitter-proxy-servers-deliver-news/

DMLResearchHub 2011, Media Scholar Henry Jenkins on Participatory Culture and Civic Engagement, 4 August, viewed 8 December 2012 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZgZ4ph3dSmY

ScottLondon n.d., Book Review: The Virtual Community, n.d. viewed 8 December 2012, http://www.scottlondon.com/reviews/rheingold.html

Friday, November 30, 2012

Talk To The Phone, I'm Not Home!


 
“Back in my day (when dinosaurs roamed the earth) we didn’t text people we used to just show up to their place or we’d use the land line”
(everyone over forty)
I’ve heard this dozens of times from parents, grandparents and elder co-workers.  They would then proceed to tell me about what the land line looked like with its spin dialer.   As I was born in ‘90s I do not remember a time without mobile devices (I also cringe when I hear the words “back in my day…”) though as I’ve grown up mobile devices have advanced in technology and become more prevalent in everyday life.  Before the smart phone was the humble flip phone with its push buttons as opposed to touch screens and applications.  Though I do miss a good game of ‘snake’, mobile devices have advanced combining other technologies such as the digital camera, the mp3 player and the internet.   The smart phone is seen as a revolutionary device though it has evolved from other technologies (Haddon, L & Green, N 2009). 
My phone saves me time I can send and receive emails for work and texts are quicker than calling.  I can connect with my friends at any hour of the day with social networking applications such as facebook and instagram.  My phone often takes better quality photos than a digital camera and I can directly post them to social networking sites. 
In many ways my phone is also my security blanket.  When I’m on a night out and I’m walking back to my car I feel safer with my phone being there.  I’ll admit that when I go to a friend’s place I’ll text them to let me in.  I’ll call if they don’t answer but my last resort is actually knocking!  To be honest knocking actually makes me feel apprehensive.   
I personally have an android smart phone that I have a love/hate relationship with.  I have identified a pattern that whenever I’m lonely or bored that I send a text or I connect to social networking sites  and though I’m communicating with people it often makes me feel more alone than when I started.  I was very interested listening to psychologist, Sherry Turkle’s TED talk ‘Connected, but alone’ and I identified strongly with a few of the points she made.  Turkle (2012) mentions ‘we’re alone but we’re afraid of intimacy’.  Does this explain my apprehension with the front door?  That knocking and greeting someone face to face is too intimate? 
Turkle (2012) goes on to say that ‘being alone feels like a problem that needs to be solved’. We connect with our devices when we’re lonely as we don’t how to deal with solitude.  In the past I have made concerted efforts to be ‘in the moment’ with friends having dinner, at board game nights, at parties only to be met with their mobile device beeping away with every text, facebook comment, etc .  It’s disconcerting that they are physically in your presence but really they’re consumed in their virtual world.  Our use of these devices is distancing ourselves from others and is actually making us more alone. 
So I’m putting a little challenge out there for both myself and everyone else to live ‘in the moment’, gain a little bit of independence and reduce the usage of mobile devices…well at least whilst we’re at dinner.    
 
References
Haddon, L. and Green, N. 2009, Mobile Communications: an introduction to new media, EBL Ebook Library, Berg, viewed 30 November 2012.
Turkle, S 2012, Connected, but alone? TED Conversations, viewed 26 November 2012, http://www.ted.com/talks/sherry_turkle_alone_together.html.